Buyer guide
How to choose a geopolitical risk intelligence provider
A fair buyer's guide to geopolitical and political risk intelligence: the main types of provider, the criteria that matter, questions to ask on a call and red flags to watch for.
Buyer guide
Choosing a risk intelligence providerLast updated
By Zed Three analysts
Short answer
Start with the decision you need to support, then match it to the type of provider: data and ratings, automated monitoring platforms, analyst led advisory or field support. Test each shortlisted provider on your real exposure, and judge the output on specificity, freshness, forward looking signposts, clear likelihood language and honest limits.
Last updated
What types of geopolitical risk intelligence provider are there?
The label covers very different products. Each is legitimate on its own terms, and none is a substitute for the others.
- Country ratings and dataIndices and scores that compare countries. Good for benchmarking, portfolio screening and disclosure. Less useful for a specific site or supplier.
- Automated monitoring platformsSoftware that scans large volumes of events and sends alerts. Fast and broad. You still need someone to judge what matters.
- Analyst led advisoryWritten assessments and briefings from human analysts, from large global firms to smaller specialist teams. Strong on judgement and scenarios.
- Security and field supportTravel security, on-the-ground checks and assistance. Essential for duty of care, usually narrower on wider political analysis.
What criteria matter most?
- Fit to your decisionDoes the output speak to your routes, suppliers and sites, or would it read the same for any company?
- FreshnessIs every judgement dated, and how fast is the view updated when events move?
- Forward viewDoes it name the events and signposts that would change the assessment over the next months?
- Clear likelihood languageAre judgements expressed as likelihood ranges with confidence, rather than vague words?
- CoverageDoes it cover the countries, chokepoints and sectors you actually depend on?
- Format and cadenceAlerts, monthly or quarterly reports, calls, or data feeds: does it match how your team works?
- Independence and standardsIs the provider independent, clear about who it will and will not work for, and does it screen clients?
- Access to peopleCan you talk to the analyst who wrote the work?
The single best test is simple: give every shortlisted provider the same real question about your exposure, such as a supplier country or a shipping route, and compare what comes back.
What questions should you ask a provider?
- Can you show me a sample built on an exposure like ours?
- Which of your outputs are automated and which are reviewed by an analyst?
- When something material changes, how do you tell us and how quickly?
- How do you express likelihood and confidence?
- Who will we speak to, and will it be the same person each time?
- How do you scope and quote the work, and what is the minimum commitment?
- Which clients or purposes do you decline?
- What do you not cover well?
What are the red flags?
- Every country gets a score but nothing explains what it means for you.
- Undated judgements, or reports that never say what would change the view.
- Certainty with no likelihood ranges or stated confidence.
- No sample output before a sales process.
- Claims of special access or official status that cannot be checked.
- Willingness to surveil private individuals or collect information illegally.
- Long lock-in before you have seen the work on your own exposure.
Where Zed Three fits
Zed Three is an analyst led provider for mid-market companies in Canada and the United States. It suits teams that want written judgement on a specific watchlist, with monitoring, custom reports, a dedicated analyst and case by case field support. If you mainly need a large data feed, a country index for benchmarking or round the clock security assistance, another type of provider may suit you better, and many teams combine more than one.
Judge the work for free
Free industry newsletter
Get Chokepoint free
The free industry newsletter going to 100K+ industry experts. The five stories that move markets, supply chains and deals, each with the so what worked out, every weekday morning.
Frequently asked questions
What does a geopolitical risk intelligence provider do?
It helps organizations understand how political, conflict, sanctions and security developments abroad could affect them. Providers range from country rating and data firms to automated monitoring platforms, analyst led advisories and security or field support specialists.
What is the difference between a risk intelligence platform and an advisory firm?
A platform is software that gathers and alerts on events at scale. An advisory firm provides human analysis and judgement. Many companies use a platform for breadth and an analyst led provider for decisions.
How should I test a provider before buying?
Give each shortlisted provider the same real question about your exposure, such as a supplier country or a shipping route, and compare the outputs on specificity, freshness, forward view and clarity.
What questions should I ask a political risk consulting firm?
Ask for a sample on an exposure like yours, how they express likelihood, how fast they alert you to change, who you will speak to, which clients they decline and what they do not cover well.
Do I need a large provider?
Not always. Large firms offer breadth and brand. Smaller specialist teams can offer closer attention to a specific watchlist. Choose on fit to your decision, not size.
How does Zed Three compare?
Zed Three is a private, independent, analyst led provider for mid-market companies. You can judge the work for free through the World Threat Map, the Chokepoint newsletter and a free custom sample report.
Free custom sample
Test Zed Three on your own exposure
Tell us your routes, suppliers or sites and Zed Three will build a free custom sample report around them. Every engagement is scoped on a call.